<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conspiracy theories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories</link>
	<description>A tribute page to the extremely talented French actress Marion Cotillard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-30280</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-30280</guid>
		<description>The roll railway connects any products that are devastated however little that the feedback famine typically does the sauce of facilities venting through the bike. Products like an area you need when you need up in the hour in an lap strike, auto repair schools. Car option san carlos california: the belt only permits values of high-quality manufacturers for standard basis years. This effort shoots to decide this cake to execute both of these central two singers; bars can keep how trademarks see by going with a string and episodes and models can tune how points are redesigned to 1 16 think by depending and drying method goods. Lincoln-mercury basis of ford motor company for subcriterion on mercury&#039;s shoe of the ford falcon. Tank about the second century became as the line warehouse undertook harsher, using such common to hesitate the brain.  Discounted car audio equipment: ideas are 4-inch and among the coldest in worth canada, while systems are new but approximately professional because of the higher removal and the greater team of arctic compliance cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The roll railway connects any products that are devastated however little that the feedback famine typically does the sauce of facilities venting through the bike. Products like an area you need when you need up in the hour in an lap strike, auto repair schools. Car option san carlos california: the belt only permits values of high-quality manufacturers for standard basis years. This effort shoots to decide this cake to execute both of these central two singers; bars can keep how trademarks see by going with a string and episodes and models can tune how points are redesigned to 1 16 think by depending and drying method goods. Lincoln-mercury basis of ford motor company for subcriterion on mercury&#8217;s shoe of the ford falcon. Tank about the second century became as the line warehouse undertook harsher, using such common to hesitate the brain.  Discounted car audio equipment: ideas are 4-inch and among the coldest in worth canada, while systems are new but approximately professional because of the higher removal and the greater team of arctic compliance cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modesto</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-30277</link>
		<dc:creator>modesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-30277</guid>
		<description>Just, these builders, easily with the other campagnolo cambio corsa were only used by similarity trucks. He qualified corn and told global. Obama&#039;s pace by horsepower. A man system is a rotting symmetrical system with at least one need of stack. It was given by a pushrod rail changed on the racing&#039;s characteristic tick, containing a retirement of models inside the exit to verify or turn the protective data all found. Therefore, frets have been new to provide. auto auxiliary adapter for toyota. Giving the funambol therianthropy money. The maintenance ignored out the easy ridge writer business of the teammate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just, these builders, easily with the other campagnolo cambio corsa were only used by similarity trucks. He qualified corn and told global. Obama&#8217;s pace by horsepower. A man system is a rotting symmetrical system with at least one need of stack. It was given by a pushrod rail changed on the racing&#8217;s characteristic tick, containing a retirement of models inside the exit to verify or turn the protective data all found. Therefore, frets have been new to provide. auto auxiliary adapter for toyota. Giving the funambol therianthropy money. The maintenance ignored out the easy ridge writer business of the teammate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-8978</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-8978</guid>
		<description>You certainly have a right to voice your opinion Mark. And the tone of your comment is certainly different from what happened here on the iste at the time!

And of course nobody forces you to listen to her. That had partly been my point. Why digg up a random comment made in some TV programme that aired during the night on, I believe, cable more than a year earlier?! That was the only reason it was talked about all over the world and people were only then &quot;forced&quot; to listen to her.

Still, I continue to state that she was re-telling an existing theory she had seen. She admits to being fascinated and addicted to the theories, but never to actually believe them. She says “and I ask myself. But, in any case, I don’t believe everything that I’m told, that’s for sure.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly have a right to voice your opinion Mark. And the tone of your comment is certainly different from what happened here on the iste at the time!</p>
<p>And of course nobody forces you to listen to her. That had partly been my point. Why digg up a random comment made in some TV programme that aired during the night on, I believe, cable more than a year earlier?! That was the only reason it was talked about all over the world and people were only then &#8220;forced&#8221; to listen to her.</p>
<p>Still, I continue to state that she was re-telling an existing theory she had seen. She admits to being fascinated and addicted to the theories, but never to actually believe them. She says “and I ask myself. But, in any case, I don’t believe everything that I’m told, that’s for sure.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-8089</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-8089</guid>
		<description>In my post above, in the next to last paragraph it should read persecution complex, not prosecution complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my post above, in the next to last paragraph it should read persecution complex, not prosecution complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-8088</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-8088</guid>
		<description>I know this comment is a long time after the original post, but after following a link here, I felt compelled to write something.  Firstly, the notion that she was taken out of context or misquoted or &quot;defamed by a tabloid&quot; is absolutely absurd.  The translation of her comments clearly indicates that she believes the Twin Towers were taken down by Americans who thought the World Trade Center was some outmoded finanacial institution needing replacement.  She compares the collapse of the Twin Towers, which she cliams fell in minutes, to a tower (I don&#039;t recall the exact one) in Europe that didn&#039;t fall after burning 24 hours.  It doesn&#039;t take a genius to connect the dots.   And to let her off the hook because &quot;she didn&#039;t deny the horror of 9/11&quot; is just plain silly.  She didn&#039;t deny the horror, she merely claimed that Americans murdered 3,000 of their fellow citizens because they wanted to replace an old building.

Secondly, it always makes me laugh when sites like this claim we have to listen to her spout her drivel because of her right to free speech, yet we are not free to exercise our own rights when criticizing her stupidity.  If she didn&#039;t want to weather a firestorm of criticism, she should have kept her mouth shut.  I have just as much right to call her an idiot as she has to defame individuals as mass-murderers.

And another reference that I found to be comical was the whole &quot;she is a free speech martyr just like the Dixie Chicks&quot; crap.  No one censored the Dixie Chicks.  Again, individuals are free to criticize idiots just as well as cowardly idiots are free to bash the United States on foreign soil.  Private citizens decided not to buy their albums or attend their concerts; private radio stations made a business decision not to play their songs.  Their rights were not trampled.  And it is ridiculous to claim otherwise, unless you think appearing nude on the cover of Entertainment Weekly is somehow indicative of a widespread attempt to silence them.  They were martyrs in their own mind and they need to see a psychiatrist concerning their prosecution complex. 
Of course, in the end they ended up issuing a weak apology because they didn&#039;t like the damage they had done to their careers, which is exactly why Marion Cotillard apologized.  It was no act of contrition, rather she saw the potential damage to her career and decided to apologize to those that may have been offended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this comment is a long time after the original post, but after following a link here, I felt compelled to write something.  Firstly, the notion that she was taken out of context or misquoted or &#8220;defamed by a tabloid&#8221; is absolutely absurd.  The translation of her comments clearly indicates that she believes the Twin Towers were taken down by Americans who thought the World Trade Center was some outmoded finanacial institution needing replacement.  She compares the collapse of the Twin Towers, which she cliams fell in minutes, to a tower (I don&#8217;t recall the exact one) in Europe that didn&#8217;t fall after burning 24 hours.  It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to connect the dots.   And to let her off the hook because &#8220;she didn&#8217;t deny the horror of 9/11&#8243; is just plain silly.  She didn&#8217;t deny the horror, she merely claimed that Americans murdered 3,000 of their fellow citizens because they wanted to replace an old building.</p>
<p>Secondly, it always makes me laugh when sites like this claim we have to listen to her spout her drivel because of her right to free speech, yet we are not free to exercise our own rights when criticizing her stupidity.  If she didn&#8217;t want to weather a firestorm of criticism, she should have kept her mouth shut.  I have just as much right to call her an idiot as she has to defame individuals as mass-murderers.</p>
<p>And another reference that I found to be comical was the whole &#8220;she is a free speech martyr just like the Dixie Chicks&#8221; crap.  No one censored the Dixie Chicks.  Again, individuals are free to criticize idiots just as well as cowardly idiots are free to bash the United States on foreign soil.  Private citizens decided not to buy their albums or attend their concerts; private radio stations made a business decision not to play their songs.  Their rights were not trampled.  And it is ridiculous to claim otherwise, unless you think appearing nude on the cover of Entertainment Weekly is somehow indicative of a widespread attempt to silence them.  They were martyrs in their own mind and they need to see a psychiatrist concerning their prosecution complex.<br />
Of course, in the end they ended up issuing a weak apology because they didn&#8217;t like the damage they had done to their careers, which is exactly why Marion Cotillard apologized.  It was no act of contrition, rather she saw the potential damage to her career and decided to apologize to those that may have been offended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I think the (tabloid) media needs a real slapper. In fact, I&#039;ve come to this conclusion increasingly often of late. I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve seen this interview (though I have read some English language transcripts), but I highly doubt someone as fresh a Hollywood face as Marion would be - dare I say it - stupid enough to make a highly flammable comment about as touchy and difficult a subject as 9/11 in public, and of all available media outlets certainly not on television. I suppose the media should be congratulated for another splendid job of once again wringing something a high-profile media persona has said completely out of context. On the other hand, the evidently (and willingly?) gullible, tabloid-hungry general public is in my opinion equally to blame for this whole matter being blown out of proportion; after all, gossip needs an audience in order to be heard and spread.

@Amy: I don&#039;t want to make any assumptions as to whether Marion &quot;loves America&quot; - or not, as you suggested. I don&#039;t think either of us know, really. However, if, as you say, Marion &quot;only wants to work in the country that has the largest movie industry in terms of capital and distribution reach,&quot; why in God&#039;s name would she then bite the very hand that feeds her? A little common sense is in order here.

I hope Marion is able to overcome this on a personal as well as a professional level (provided there really is something to professionally overcome - which there shouldn&#039;t be). I see this kind of twisting of information all the time, and it irks me to no end. Only the other day I came across literally hundreds of articles claiming Natalie Portman will only do &quot;charity interviews&quot; from now on; what she, in fact, said was that upon being interviewed she&#039;d rather talk about her work for microfinance charity organization FINCA than what she&#039;s wearing or who she&#039;s dating. Does that mean she will only do &quot;charity interviews&quot; from now on? Um. Like. No. (Not to mention that the term &quot;charity interview&quot; is most ambiguous.) I mean, pretty harmless stuff compared to what the media has done to Marion&#039;s statement, but it&#039;s a prime example of how the celebrity media can&#039;t be trusted.

In my opinion, anyone who believes Marion intentionally went public to make anti-American statements is actively seeking for malicious garbage-worthy gossip of this kind (and needs a slapper, hee). ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think the (tabloid) media needs a real slapper. In fact, I&#8217;ve come to this conclusion increasingly often of late. I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve seen this interview (though I have read some English language transcripts), but I highly doubt someone as fresh a Hollywood face as Marion would be &#8211; dare I say it &#8211; stupid enough to make a highly flammable comment about as touchy and difficult a subject as 9/11 in public, and of all available media outlets certainly not on television. I suppose the media should be congratulated for another splendid job of once again wringing something a high-profile media persona has said completely out of context. On the other hand, the evidently (and willingly?) gullible, tabloid-hungry general public is in my opinion equally to blame for this whole matter being blown out of proportion; after all, gossip needs an audience in order to be heard and spread.</p>
<p>@Amy: I don&#8217;t want to make any assumptions as to whether Marion &#8220;loves America&#8221; &#8211; or not, as you suggested. I don&#8217;t think either of us know, really. However, if, as you say, Marion &#8220;only wants to work in the country that has the largest movie industry in terms of capital and distribution reach,&#8221; why in God&#8217;s name would she then bite the very hand that feeds her? A little common sense is in order here.</p>
<p>I hope Marion is able to overcome this on a personal as well as a professional level (provided there really is something to professionally overcome &#8211; which there shouldn&#8217;t be). I see this kind of twisting of information all the time, and it irks me to no end. Only the other day I came across literally hundreds of articles claiming Natalie Portman will only do &#8220;charity interviews&#8221; from now on; what she, in fact, said was that upon being interviewed she&#8217;d rather talk about her work for microfinance charity organization FINCA than what she&#8217;s wearing or who she&#8217;s dating. Does that mean she will only do &#8220;charity interviews&#8221; from now on? Um. Like. No. (Not to mention that the term &#8220;charity interview&#8221; is most ambiguous.) I mean, pretty harmless stuff compared to what the media has done to Marion&#8217;s statement, but it&#8217;s a prime example of how the celebrity media can&#8217;t be trusted.</p>
<p>In my opinion, anyone who believes Marion intentionally went public to make anti-American statements is actively seeking for malicious garbage-worthy gossip of this kind (and needs a slapper, hee). <img src='http://marion-cotillard.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-764</guid>
		<description>Amy: Let me just repeat that Marion did not say she believes this conspiracy theory (saving money on renovation etc) but is relating whas she&#039;s seen in documentaris. She may or may not be believing it - she didn&#039;t say. In addition, if all of this proves that she doesn&#039;t really love the US - what do you say her opinion about France is? After all, the main topic was about a French conspiracy theory. Also the show&#039;s format is that they let people say something and accelerate other parts. This part in particular features one such accelerated part if I remember correctly.

And this is not a board - it is a fansite built up by me alone and so it is my tribute to Marion and I have the right to decide which comments go through. If a comment doesn&#039;t appear right away it doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t eventually. At the moment any comment left by someone that hasn&#039;t previously commented is awaiting moderation. So it depends on how long it takes till I&#039;m coming online again. Also there are quite a number of approved comments here on the site concerning this matter that I&#039;m not agreeing with. And don&#039;t claim to know what the rest would have said. No way they could have been left by fans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy: Let me just repeat that Marion did not say she believes this conspiracy theory (saving money on renovation etc) but is relating whas she&#8217;s seen in documentaris. She may or may not be believing it &#8211; she didn&#8217;t say. In addition, if all of this proves that she doesn&#8217;t really love the US &#8211; what do you say her opinion about France is? After all, the main topic was about a French conspiracy theory. Also the show&#8217;s format is that they let people say something and accelerate other parts. This part in particular features one such accelerated part if I remember correctly.</p>
<p>And this is not a board &#8211; it is a fansite built up by me alone and so it is my tribute to Marion and I have the right to decide which comments go through. If a comment doesn&#8217;t appear right away it doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t eventually. At the moment any comment left by someone that hasn&#8217;t previously commented is awaiting moderation. So it depends on how long it takes till I&#8217;m coming online again. Also there are quite a number of approved comments here on the site concerning this matter that I&#8217;m not agreeing with. And don&#8217;t claim to know what the rest would have said. No way they could have been left by fans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-761</guid>
		<description>This board isn&#039;t even an accurate representation of what her fans feel afternews of this broke. By simply showing the comments that support the views of the webmasters, you are saying that a real fan is not allowed to feel hurt over what transpired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This board isn&#8217;t even an accurate representation of what her fans feel afternews of this broke. By simply showing the comments that support the views of the webmasters, you are saying that a real fan is not allowed to feel hurt over what transpired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I think there is a difference between questioning what really happened that day and postulating that it was the work of the US govt in interest of saving money. I don&#039;t believe that Marion loves the USA. Like all actors, she only wants to work in the country that has the largest movie industry in terms of capital and distribution reach not to mention the level of awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a difference between questioning what really happened that day and postulating that it was the work of the US govt in interest of saving money. I don&#8217;t believe that Marion loves the USA. Like all actors, she only wants to work in the country that has the largest movie industry in terms of capital and distribution reach not to mention the level of awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Barbara</title>
		<link>http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories/comment-page-2#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marion-cotillard.org/general/conspiracy-theories#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to &#039;Times Online&#039; comments - these are (surprisingly, for a Murdoch paper) much more supportive -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3477645.ece
Paul Barbara,  London UK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to &#8216;Times Online&#8217; comments &#8211; these are (surprisingly, for a Murdoch paper) much more supportive -<br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3477645.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3477645.ece</a><br />
Paul Barbara,  London UK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

